SHADO
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

News:
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send Topic
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) On Acting (Read 5899 times)
Guina
Ex Member


On Acting
Oct 25th, 2010 at 7:28pm
Print Post  
Hi,

to my amusement I see that this post will tie in and fit well with what Louise has brought back from the Fanderson convention.

It also deals with the acting and directing choices and abilities of the artists bringing UFO to us and how they influence the characters we get to see.

I am just now having a discussion about what is in character, what the actors put there and what we - as writers - ought to at least notice, quite regardless of any decisions we make. Thus I here have something which may be intriguing to those among you who wish to have a closer look at the creative process of these characters, in this case that of Straker.

These here are screen shots of Ed Bishop in another role (not long after UFO) displaying emotions and expressions which he - in this form - never ever once used for Ed Straker.

If you click on them, there should be a larger version coming up (just use the back button to come back here or use the rightclick right away).


lust derision violence
arrogance violent lust open sadism
scheming deception hatred

In case anyone wonders, no this character (Victor Stackman of Pets) isn't a nice guy, not even within a few miles of being one. He is a sadistic kidnapper of women, who he breaks via incarceration and whippings to being his lovers. In the line of that he cheats, lies, manipulates, charms and generally behaves in a rather unhinged manner. Really not nice.

What I personally find so very fascinating (and I went over all of my UFO DVDs and a couple of Bishop's other movies) is that these precise emotions we get to see here are not repeated anywhere else I watched.

Certainly not within Straker. The way Victor seduces girls is really lightyears away from how Straker comes on to (or rather backpaddles from) Jo Fraser. Victor is sassy, lies, is charming, suave and utterly sensual when faced with an object of desire. And it obviously doesn't need even the full blast of Bishop's acting to arrive there, that comes rather lightly, offhandedly.

By which it gets pretty clear that what we do not see from or in Straker is not missing because of any lack of acting capacity or knowledge in Bishop. The guy really knew what he was doing. No, he and the directors obviously decided to not put it there in the first place. Which again gels with the quote I cited regarding Bishop and how he saw Straker.

To me, as a writer, that means that I have to place trust into what these actors and the producers/directors did, and not fill in what I think should be filled in because I dislike what is there or would like what isn't there.

Food for thoughts.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Guina
Ex Member


Re: On Acting
Reply #1 - Oct 26th, 2010 at 7:18am
Print Post  
Hi again,

the last picture should now also work in the large version.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Auspicious
Ex Member


Re: On Acting
Reply #2 - Jan 6th, 2011 at 4:34am
Print Post  
One with powder blue turtlebeck and  leather jacket and wig.

"You REALLY should have warned me!"

"Well I thought this is just what the sociopathic art gallery owner who cages females should wear, Alec! Okay so I got tired of the Nehru. Not me? Sigh. Undecided I hope Harrods takes this outfit back--
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Guina
Ex Member


Re: On Acting
Reply #3 - Jan 6th, 2011 at 7:38am
Print Post  
Quote:
One with powder blue turtlebeck and  leather jacket and wig.


No wig. The turtleneck is his own.

"Sociopathic" just might be a tad too unfair to good ole Victor. Sadistic yes, but not on a psychological  level with Dahmer. Who knows what would have happened, had he been introduced to SSC?

I find the typically 70ies american slacks he wore there way worse.
« Last Edit: Jan 6th, 2011 at 1:29pm by »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Lightcudder
Colonel
*****
Offline


Trust no one.

Posts: 1311
Location: Here. When you least expect it
Re: On Acting
Reply #4 - Jan 6th, 2011 at 9:07am
Print Post  
Quote:
I find the typically 70ies american slacks he wore there way worse.


It's the medallion that gets me. Grin
  

I need some air.
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Guina
Ex Member


Re: On Acting
Reply #5 - Jan 6th, 2011 at 12:39pm
Print Post  
Quote:
It's the medallion that gets me.


Awww now! I have photos of my parents and their friends wearing such stuff, usually peace signs. Way cute!

Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Auspicious
Ex Member


Re: On Acting
Reply #6 - Jan 7th, 2011 at 3:16am
Print Post  
Yes wig, I'm 99 percent sure I was told or read that he used a wig. I know he owned the turtleneck. He made observations about Straker that made me regret he had not also tried writing. He said once it would have been his second choice of career. I had a lot of sources during my time as moderator-founder of EdBishopFans.I also knew things I could not reveal, often at Bishop's personal insistence. He never spoke to me but I had access to him. We lost a fine performer and human being. (hi Marc! Yeah, I'm alive, chuckle) I have a lot of his work. I even have a video of something he did which I know no other fan has. It was given to me by someone he'd done work for, as a tribute to my dedication to Ed.

Sociopaths have feeling, but it is for themselves. The mania for capturing women fit, I can see Victor upgrading to murder easily even if you can't. What was funny is that Bishop was such a devotee for women's lib and said so. They added the porn to that film afterwards, which made Bishop take it off his cv. I felt even though it was a crummy film, like a gold frame holding a bad photograph, he did express feelings about losing the gallery to a woman. Some of that was legit. Like fathers losing custody-the whole Priority business.

I saw indications of the emotions you indicated in the screen caps from Pets  in Straker. Mind you not full fledged but hints.
And yeah if anyone cares, Auspicious is Amelia. Cool
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Auspicious
Ex Member


Re: On Acting
Reply #7 - Jan 7th, 2011 at 3:31am
Print Post  
that medallion intrigued me, I like art that is worn, and it fitted Victor. At one point that tiger was about to claw Bishop  Shocked
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Guina
Ex Member


Re: On Acting
Reply #8 - Jan 7th, 2011 at 9:10am
Print Post  
Hi Amelia (or would you prefer I call you Auspicious?),

Quote:
Yes wig, I'm 99 percent sure I was told or read that he used a wig.


No wig. For one thing such a shabby outfit as produced that movie could not have afforded the kind of wig necessary to make the hair look as naturally attached to the scalp as Bishop's did in that film Wink Even tho that would have been more than they likely paid all actors put together, cause it would be fitting as well as Connery's in "Red October" (and we all know what that wig cost). For another, there are several sets of photos showing him going to a variety of events during that time in the US, and he has that exact  mane, just kempt back instead. Thirdly, no wig works up a lather like natural hair does when the owner sweats. Many tiny pointers anyway, which (when you look at wigs of the time, even expensive ones) tell you it's the real hair. And why not? One of his best features, really. Pity they highlighted it there, I liked Bishop's dark hair.

Quote:
We lost a fine performer and human being.


You won't find anyone disagreeing with that.

Quote:
Sociopaths have feeling, but it is for themselves. The mania for capturing women fit, I can see Victor upgrading to murder easily even if you can't.


Sorry, no. Victor simply lacks too many of the basic requirements for a diagnosis of sociopath. He displays feelings for others, repeatedly, the given backstory has him pretty much a normal person up to several key experiences, thus he hasn't started that off as a child, he isn't cruel to his animals (as in what you would see from a sociopath), he just collects and hence jails them, the taming process as shown is comparatively considerate, not brutal and unempathetic. I could go on, but that alone already makes it clear Victor isn't anywhere near of what kind of personality gets correctly diagnosed sociopathic.

I'm actually quite partial to Victor. He's a sadist alright, though he probably would not even qualify as a sadist in need of medical treatment for the fact per se. More like counselling regarding his neurotic reactions to what happened to him and a shove towards consensual sadomasochism.

Quote:
They added the porn to that film afterwards, which made Bishop take it off his cv.


There is no way he can have filmed some of those scenes without being absolutely clear about just what sort of sexploitation movie he was in. I saw one version of the movie so far, and received a detailed review of the scenes lacking in the one currently being sold. There's no real porn anywhere, though lots of naked butts and breasts (nipples included) and some shenanigans which do look a bit softcore. It's also not the only movie like that he was in, he obviously sometimes made poor choices as to what work to take and what not. I pull my hat though for his grit in going through with such stuff very professionally.

Quote:
I felt even though it was a crummy film, like a gold frame holding a bad photograph, he did express feelings about losing the gallery to a woman. Some of that was legit.


Chuckling, few men react to that by caging and taming females. But I agree, the movie had an intriguing premise. Had a Nicholas Roeg been director, we even might have gotten a real whopper of a movie.

Quote:
I saw indications of the emotions you indicated in the screen caps from Pets  in Straker. Mind you not full fledged but hints.


Where would those be?

Quote:
And yeah if anyone cares, Auspicious is Amelia. Cool


Most have guessed as much by now. So how do you wish to be addressed?

And err yessss, that tiger came close to having a slice of Bishop... understandable enough  Grin
« Last Edit: Jan 7th, 2011 at 12:42pm by »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Guina
Ex Member


Re: On Acting
Reply #9 - Jan 7th, 2011 at 12:38pm
Print Post  
Calebschosen wrote on Jan 7th, 2011 at 12:07am:
Now I feel really old ....................................


Errr - you own such a medaillon?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Auspicious
Ex Member


Re: On Acting
Reply #10 - Jan 7th, 2011 at 6:30pm
Print Post  
>>Where would those be?<<
I'm not going to hunt for them all but you overlooked one.   Lust. The obvious example is Responsibility Seat. The eye crawl up the legs, the way he looks at her. The whole change from the "I'm no PR man" to taking her to the car, etc. Outside of UFO one example that comes to mind is The Mad Death. Again, lust.
Everyone can call me Amelia or whatever their preference is.
Bishop may not have seen the finished script. I was told by someone that would have known he didn't know how bad that thing was.
Talking about Games Girls Play?  Grin Madame Claude? The disrobing scene in Kill Straker? (just teasing about that one)
If the definition of porn includes a rendition of the sex act, then Pets is porn.Yeah, Bishop's performance was an oil painting in a cracked frame. I have never seen him act badly. I love his book reading. Especially Snow White Rose Red. He plays all the chars in that. Oh and The Light in August.
Have you ever seen him on stage? I haven't. I would have loved it.



  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Auspicious
Ex Member


Re: On Acting
Reply #11 - Jan 7th, 2011 at 6:38pm
Print Post  
My husband just said scheming was Destruction, the whole golf invitation to get Foster to do what he wanted. The keys business. There are bits and pieces of the emotions displayed in Pets  in  UFO.
I still feel strongely Stackman had the potential and could have been tipped into murder.
I have my sociopathic days.  Shocked
  Grin







  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Guina
Ex Member


Re: On Acting
Reply #12 - Jan 7th, 2011 at 7:17pm
Print Post  
Hi Amelia,

Quote:
I'm not going to hunt for them all but you overlooked one.   Lust. The obvious example is Responsibility Seat. The eye crawl up the legs, the way he looks at her. The whole change from the "I'm no PR man" to taking her to the car, etc.


I wouldn't exactly call that lust. Lust looks different and he showed he knew the difference. After he realized she was having him on, there is not a single instance of lust or simple attraction (which I would classify what went up until that point) in sight. Actually he has a row of very nicely paranoid looks of loathing on the plate later (before the kissing scene).

Quote:
Outside of UFO


Oh, this is only about UFO, not anything else. So yes, there sure may have been other instances outside UFO, no problem.

Quote:
Everyone can call me Amelia


As you started out incognito and under pseudonym here, I am perfectly willing to go by that.

Quote:
Bishop may not have seen the finished script. I was told by someone that would have known he didn't know how bad that thing was.


Yep, such things happen. Today actors have grown smarter and include opt-out clauses.

Quote:
If the definition of porn includes a rendition of the sex act, then Pets is porn.


The common definition of hardcore porn is the full visibility of fe/male genitalia and PIV or PIA sexual acts in open view with the purpose of sexually arousing the watcher. Anything else might be adult or mature stuff, but not exactly porn.

Nagisa Oshima's rightfully famous and much lauded "In the Realm of the Senses" includes practically non-stop sexual acts between men and women, fully visible as well (the actors were normal actors, and not porn actors, yet they committed the act as demanded by the director), and ends in the severing of a thingy as an act of undying love. Yet you'll find no serious movie critic calling this film porn. Hence - the simple act alone is no measure of porn or no porn.

Quote:
Have you ever seen him on stage? I haven't. I would have loved it.


Not on the stage, unfortunately. Only afterwards.

Quote:
I still feel strongely Stackman had the potential and could have been tipped into murder.


Most people will murder if the motive is the right one. Stackman might have been tipped into full-blown sadistic behaviour, he quite clearly is basically a sadomasochist of the non-con variety.

But again no sociopath - he lacks too many necessary symptoms to even come within reach of being a real psychopath, not to speak of a sociopath. Unfortunately the term has been much abused, which is one reason why it is currently under critique.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ LinkedIn reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo