Hi Normandie,
Quote:I don't think we were meant to think she was a bimbo - or that he had poor judgement in women. Iirc, her waiting up for hubby was conducted with a pair of horn-rimmed specs and a book rather than a bit of flowery cross-stitch.
Err, she was way too unsexy to have been meant as a bimbo. Ealing had more appeal in that department

and most certainly Nina or any of the three witches up on Moonbase

No, no, anywhere the Andersons wanted women with a thorough sex appeal they knew how to produce that.
Quote:The book may have been a Danielle Steel or similar pap (sorry to all devotees of DS!) but I never got the impression she was supposed to be an airhead.
Well, I contend that part. See below.
Quote:Yes, the majority of Straker fans labelled her as a dimbo because she didn't make the connections that would have led her to conclude - and submissively accept - that her husband wasn't all that he now said he was - suddenly a movie studio executive - but I didn't really buy into that analysis.
No, that's not my point at all. Additionally I dunno where everyone gets the impression from that he was a studio exec early during their marriage. He wore uniform quite often and well into it (ref. Confetti Check), so she must have thought him being MI well up to the birth of their son.
Quote:The script attempted to write her as a woman of the early 70s - or at least a few years on from when the series was filmed, even if she was supposed to represent a woman of the 80s - and I think as written there's nothing to suggest she wasn't a reasonable choice as a (civilian) wife for Straker.
Well, there *are* quite a few working women in the series. So the fact that she isn't
is of relevance, I'd say. And that is the beginning of daft and superficial for me.
Quote:The alternative was a blind trust in her man which - even in the 1980s - would have been a touch on the naïve side.
Err no. And - err differently. I positively hate that trope of "woman marries policeman/vet/doc - turns on him for his work hours".
Even at the time of the series it was shallow and idiotic (and means the woman is dafter than a poodle :

). Not that much later "All Creatures Great and Small" was filmed, first as a movie and then as a series (funnily with Christopher Timothy who was submarine crew in Psychobombs) and we get to see loads of nicely conventional women all married to very busily working men keeping totally ungodly hours and they manage to smile and be
supportive!
Mary knew ahead what she'd marry, like anyone who marries someone with an exacting job. You just don't marry an ER doc and then expect to have him/her home for dinner spot on every day.
Quote:Although, it was her ma who employed the PI.
No excuse at all, on the contrary. I mean, she's an adult, married and pregnant woman. How can she have her mother dictate her life and not be rather daft?
It may be a necessary plot point and it - in my book - shows that they wanted to paint her the poor wifey, because had she at least engaged that PI herself she would have shown some pluck, initiative and intelligence, but instead she is the total pushover.
Quote:Also, I don't think Mary blamed Straker for the accident... I think she blamed him for not achieving the miracle of saving Johnny.
I agree with that.
Quote:I think Mary gets a raw deal from the fans. But I should probably re-watch the episode.
As I said, she throws a rather - hm - challenging light on Straker's choices in his private life.
She *is* a daft chick - no profession, no real hobbies, no engaging in the local community, no intelligence to speak of, immediately remarried with the exact same dependance spiel, expecting a behaviour from her partner which he can't furnish (and knowing that ahead). That is more than a little daft to me.
My parents and their friends were of that age at that time, and their life was 100% different. Hell, we are talking the swinging sixties and seventies here! The pill, Woodstock, the Stones - ya know? My mom worked and put my father through half of his university studies that way.
As to Straker, either he ought to have chosen a less dependant, clingy wife - if he ever had any plans for a military career (if it had taken a different direction, he'd still have had the same problem), or he should have sat her down and reasoned it out with her to the point where she will take up some own activities with which to fill the time he is not there. Any which way, he sure did not react on any sort of spot here. And he chose poorly, maybe conventionally, but still poorly.
So unlike some I don't see this as a one-sided thing. My criticism goes to Straker as well. Mary might have been the perfect wife for some bank manager with a plushy 9-to-5 job. But certainly not to a career officer.
And if anything, yeah, she should have taken it up with him, but not wailing, clinging and giving the drama queen. That the writers were capable of writing different stuff for women, we have throughout the series (including those scheming to shoot their hubbies), so they must have wanted what we got here.