Quote: I was expecting a longer story, thinking that you were using the game as a parallel. But the story stands well, just as it is.
The assignment called for a short story. Normally I'd explore the issue further. Yeah, the game was parallel and a 'dire situation' the literary theme. Straker says :
Quote:Some things in life are not to be tolerated. This is one of them. I've given more enough to them. I've sacrificed. That stops, stops now, stops tonight. Precious moments, like a string of pearls. A duel, to the death. A triumph to be seized. Some humans have incisors too. Tonight, he thought in amusement at his own melodrama, tonight I bite, tonight I taste blood.
Straker's talking about the divorce, he gave more than enough to her, sacrificed, but tonight he decides to fight back, by deliberately refusing to go along with the Rutlands when it comes down to the comfort of his own son, who is upset by the stepfather appearing in his life, and being told he can't play a game which all his school pals are playing.
Normally I don't go into explanation or what I do in a piece, but I'm trying it out now.

So with that, about Mary making a mistake, oh
YEAH.
You can see it in Priority. So I made this for soon after she remarried, and she's using Rutland and her son as pawns in a game with Straker.
Fail. Straker here is barely concealing his temper to begin with, then she gets even more stupid by threatening to take the visitations away, "I have Phillip" suggesting that Straker can't lord over her now that she has a new guy in her life.
Fail. He goes commando on her. He doesn't specify what he'd do to her, but we all know Straker's wrath, and imagination is a powerful thing.
Quote:Amelia, I agree with your take on Mary and Rutland, I never thought that she was happy with him. Right after John got hit by the car, Mary didn't turn to her husband to do something, she turned to Ed. To me, That was telling.
Oh
yeah,Matt,
Denise. I saw it too. Plus Rutland just stood there. What I found even more telling was the scene in the hospital, where he tells Mary something like "We'll see to the boy." I used that revealing omission in one of my stories, don't recall which one. It told me Rutland had no real feelings for Johnny. Fine, it wasn't his real son, but he could have at least used his name. He didn't. I think he may have resented that Johnny was Mary's last bond to Straker in spite of the marriage, and Straker not only is military but strikingly handsome, two well-deserved barbs under Rutland's skin. Straker wouldn't buy into Rutland's crap, the man-to-man, alpha male nonsense. He's far too intelligent for manipulation, but as Matt pointed out, he's human, and gets in some insults directed at Mary and Rutland, intellect capacity of dung (that was my husband's idea, I loved it

) It isn't until Mary threatened to take away visitation that Straker explodes, both verbally and by disregard for her personal space, which is a damn powerful thing to use in an argument. Straker would know how to fight strategically in that manner, and saying she'd take his beloved son away was the last straw.
Knowing how to fight to win,
know thy enemy that was why Straker knew all about the dire rat's stats. It's possible he interrogated the store owner and bought a book, or maybe he went to a certain website like I did.

There's a store in Berkeley (they run RPG's there too, Deborah) which was my model for the
Forbidden Cavern.
My husband just said Straker's
play would be
deadly serious. Even in a RPG, he'd need to win, and he'd brief himself on dire rat slaughter. (Not that it was an advantage, a lucky dice roll would be an advantage, with the DM's approval) So being killed off
REALLY sucked for the Commander.
There's always empty calories at McDonalds to lift your spirits, Commander Straker.